Neste repositório, você encontra orientações formuladas por diversas universidade do mundo sobre como usar a Inteligência Artificial de maneira ética e responsável no Ensino Superior.
Brasil
Universidade Estadual Paulista (2025) – RESOLUÇÃO UNESP Nº 13
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2024) – Recomendações para o Uso de Ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial nas Atividades Acadêmicas na UFMG
Austrália
University of Technology Sydney (2022) – ArtificialIntelligence Operations Policy
Bélgica
Ghent University (2025) – Generative AI in Ghent University Education: Impact and Approach
Canadá
McMaster University (2024) – Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI in Teaching and Learning
University of Toronto (2025) – Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom: FAQ’s
Egito
American University in Cairo (2024) – AI in Education at AUC
Emirados Árabes Unidos
NYU Abu Dhabi (2025) – Generative AI in Education
Estados Unidos
U.S. Department of Education (2023) – Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning
Arizona State University (2023) – Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resources and Guidelines
Boise State University (2023) – Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Guidance on Use and Applicable Policies
Boston College Center for Teaching Excellence (2025) – Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning
Boston University (2023) – Policy on the Use of AI Text Generation
Brandeis University (2023) – AI Framework for Brandeis Students
Brown University (2023) – Potential impact of AI on our academic mission
Bryant University (2020) – Sample syllabus statements regarding Generative AI
Carnegie Mellon University (2023) – Examples of possible academic integrity policies that address student use of generative AI tools
Chapman University (2023) – Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hub
Clemson University (2023) – Data security concerns with AI services like ChatGPT
Colorado School of Mines (2024) – Guidelines for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence
Colorado State University (2023) – Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity
Cornell University (2023) – AI & Academic Integrity
Duke University (2023) – Generative AI and Teaching at Duke e Artificial Intelligence Policies: Guidelines and Considerations
Elon University (2023) – Generative AI: A New Era of Enlightenment Building a Responsive Strategy
Georgetown University (2024) – Honor Council Student Handbook
Havard Business School (2025) – Student Handbook
Harvard University (2025) – Guidelines for Using ChatGPT and other Generative AI tools at Harvard
Illinois State University (2023) – Suggested Syllabus Language for Teaching in the Age of AI
Indiana University (2025) – Acceptable uses of generative AI services at IU
Michigan State University (2023) – Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Reminders and Guidance for Students
Montclair State University (2022) – Practical Responses to Generative AI
Northern Illinois University (2025) – ChatGPT and Education
Northwestern University (2024) – Guidance on the Use of Generative AI: Information Technology
Notre Dame University (2023) – Generative AI Policy for Students
Pace University (2023)- Guidelines for the use of AI at Pace University
Penn State (2024) – AI guidelines
Princeton University (2023) – Guidance on AI/ChatGPT
Seattle University (2025) – Academic integrity
Stanford University (2023) – Generative AI Policy Guidance
Temple University (2025) – AI Tools for Research
Tufts University (2023) –Artificial Intelligence Resources for Tufts Faculty and Staff
UC Berkeley (2025) – Appropriate Use of Generative AI Tools
University of Alabama at Birmingham (2023) – Generative AI and UAB policy
University of British Columbia (2023) – UBC Guidance
University of Buffalo (2023) – Artificial Intelligence Guidance
University of California Los Angeles (2025) – Using Generative AI Reflectively and Responsibly in Teaching and Learning
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (2023)- Guidance on AI
University of Illinois – College of Law (2023) – Discussions of AI and ChatGPT in the Legal Academy
University of Kansas (2023) – Building AI policies into your syllabus
University of Kentucky (2023) – AI Course Policy Examples
University of Maryland (2024) – Artificial Intelligence (AI)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (2024) – How Do I Consider the Impact of AI Tools in My Courses?
University of Melbourne (2023) – Artificial intelligence tools and technologies
University of Miami (2025) – Teaching and Learning with AI
University of Michigan (2020) – Generative AI Resources
University of Minnesota (2024) – GenAI Syllabus Statements
University of Mississippi (2023) – Generative AI Resources for Instructors
University of Missouri (2023) – ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, and Academic Integrity
University of Nebraska-Lincoln (2025) – Developing course policies around A.I.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2024) – Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI e Developing AI Guidance for Faculty
University of North Texas (2025) – Student Academic Integrity
University of Oregon (2023) – Teaching and Generative AI: Course Policy and Activity Ideas
University of Pittsburgh (2025) – Acceptable Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
University of Texas at Austin (2023) – Acceptable Use of AI Tools
University of Washington (2023) – AI+Teaching
University of Waterloo (2023) – Artificial intelligence and ChatGP
University of Wisconsin-Madison (2024) – Statement on use of generative AI
Vanderbilt University (2023) – Policy Ideas for the Use of AI in Higher Education
Walden University (2023) – Guidelines for Using AI Tools in Writing and Research
Western Michigan University (2024) – Establishing AI Policies for Your Classroom
Wesleyan University (2024)– ChatGPT and other Generative AI
Worcester State University (2023) – ChatGPT and Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence)
Yale University (2025) – AI Guidance
Hong Kong
University of Hong Kong (2023) – A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning by Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan
Peru
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (2025) – LINEAMIENTOS PARA EL USO DE HERRAMIENTAS DE INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL GENERATIVA EN EL PROCESO DE ENSEÑANZA – APRENDIZAJE Y ASSESSMENT
Universidad del Pacífico (2024) – POLÍTICA PARA EL USO DE TECNOLOGÍAS DIGITALES E INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL PACÍFICO
Reino Unido
London School of Economics and Political Science (2025) – LSE position on generative AI in assessment 2025/26
St Mary’s University Twickenham London (2024) – GUIDANCE IN RELATION TO THE SAFE USE OF GENERATIVE AI
Universidade de Swansea (2025) – Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Student Assessment
Nanyang Technological University (2023) – NTU Position on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research
